- Colorado Housing and Finance Authority (CHFA) requires certification to a green building program for all federal and state HTC supported developments, supporting improved environmental and health outcomes for residents.
- International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) promotes building system energy efficiency, as amended and adopted by each jurisdiction.
- The State Model Electric Ready and Solar Ready Code supports a path to decarbonization via electrification and renewables ready strategies.
- Building Performance Standards set energy use targets and measure performance during operation, encouraging utility cost reduction.
- Find areas of alignment between energy code, green certifications, and energy funding to simplify design and construction approaches whenever possible.
- Understand regulatory considerations that can inform the choice between all-electric and electric-ready construction.
- Utilize performance energy modeling to give design teams the maximum allowable flexibility to meet code requirements and plan for Building Performance Standard compliance. This will often support a design approach that has both lower construction costs and reduced operating costs.
Alignment Opportunities
Housing Tax Credit supported developments can select a green certification including Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design (LEED) for Homes and Multifamily Mid-rise, Enterprise Green Communities (EGC), and National Green Building Standard (NGBS). To enhance competitiveness in project applications, developers can pursue advanced pathways such as Zero Energy Ready Homes (ZERH) or Passive House Certification (PHI, PHIUS). To learn more about how these programs compare, please reference “A Comparison of Multifamily Green Building Certifications.”(PDF) There are a few green certification energy requirements that are important to understand in order to identify alignment opportunities:
- The current version of the NGBS (2020) Energy Chapter references the 2018 IECC as a baseline. While the certification program offers both prescriptive and performance-based pathways for energy compliance, NGBS does not mandate energy performance that exceeds the minimum requirements established by the 2018 code. The next version of the NGBS (2024) is expected to align with the 2021 IECC as a baseline.
- LEED and EGC both require ENERGY STAR building certification for new construction. The ENERGY STAR Multifamily New Construction (MFNC) certification is a rigorous energy standard that results in better energy performance. The standard imposes above code minimum system requirements and construction phase testing that often increases project cost.
Since Colorado is a home rule state, municipal and county jurisdictions have adopted different editions of IECC, many times with custom amendments. However, the majority of jurisdictions currently have the 2012, 2015, 2018, or 2021 version of the IECC in effect. State climate action goals and bills passed by the Colorado General Assembly in recent years (HB22-1362, HB23-1233), are beginning to push more jurisdictions to adopt 2021 IECC.
Alignment Opportunity 1: Projects that have tight construction budgets and are located in a jurisdiction that has adopted the 2018 IECC or older may want to consider NGBS certification.
This will allow a code-compliant design to also satisfy green certification energy requirements. Funds that would otherwise be spent on higher performance energy systems can go to other NGBS sustainability features and building investments that better align with project goals.
Alignment Opportunity 2: Projects that pursue EGC or LEED may consider pursuing the 45L Tax Credit.
Because these green certification programs require ENERGY STAR certification, they will pre-qualify projects for the 45L Tax Credit. Note that higher levels of the tax credit can be secured via Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) certification and meeting prevailing wage requirements.
Alignment Opportunity 3: Projects that are subject to 2021 IECC may consider pursuing either EGC or LEED along with the 45L Tax Credit.
The 2021 IECC increased energy requirements compared to previous versions. As a result, there is less of a cost difference between systems required by the energy code and those required by ENERGY STAR MFNC. Additionally, many of ENERGY STAR’s construction phase testing requirements are also mandated by 2021 IECC - see the charts below for more detail. (Note that the applicable code section, Residential vs. Commercial, is determined by building height for multifamily buildings. Unless otherwise amended, three stories and under fall under Residential sections while four stories or above fall under Commercial sections of the IECC.)
3 stories or less
Residential IECC
2021
Residential IECC
Jurisdictional Considerations
Commercial IECC
2021
Commercial IECC
Alignment Opportunity 4: Projects pursuing Zero Energy Ready or Net Zero design demonstrate high alignment with CHFA’s energy efficiency and sustainability guiding principle.
These projects might consider a comprehensive review of energy funding opportunities, as several funding programs will be available to help offset higher costs associated with above code systems.
In recent years, Colorado made significant strides toward advancing sustainable building practices through legislative measures, notably HB22-1362 and HB23-1233. These bills introduced the Colorado Model Electric Ready and Solar Ready Codes, which establish standards for new construction to facilitate the integration of electrification, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and solar photovoltaic systems. The Colorado Energy Office (CEO) oversees development of these code requirements and monitors the jurisdictional adoption of these codes, with specific triggers that vary based on a jurisdiction's code cycle and the timing of the 2021 IECC adoption.
The table below summarizes the overlap between the state model codes, green building certification programs, and the Housing Tax Credit Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) published by CHFA. While EV-readiness, Solar-readiness, and Electric-readiness are not required as a prerequisite in any of the green building programs, these codes align with elective options that help achieve program certification. The state Solar-Ready and Electric-Ready codes correspond with EGC program electives, while the EV-ready code corresponds with NGBS program electives. All three state model codes support either mandatory or elective options within the QAP.
|
Green Building Certification Program |
QAP |
||
State Model Codes |
NGBS |
EGC / ESTAR |
LEED for Homes |
|
EV-Ready |
Credit 505.6 |
- |
- |
|
Solar-Ready |
- |
Credit 5.3a |
- |
|
Electric-Ready |
- |
Credit 5.5a |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meets mandatory requirements of the program |
|
||
|
Aligns with elective credits available in program |
|
||
- |
Does not contribute toward program compliance |
|
Whole building energy modeling uses physics-based software to calculate energy performance based on a selected set of building characteristics. Predictive energy modeling can help teams determine if a particular new construction design or retrofit will meet Energy Use Intensity or greenhouse gas emissions targets required by Building Performance Colorado (or other jurisdiction building performance standards). Predictive modeling works by calibrating energy models to actual or expected occupancy, operating schedules, and utility consumption. This improves the model’s ability to accurately estimate energy performance post retrofit or construction.
Code energy modeling, while less useful for estimating actual energy use, can be a flexible and cost effective pathway to meet IECC requirements. The two typical methods used to establish energy code compliance are outlined below:
-
Prescriptive (REScheck for Residential IECC, or COMcheck for Commercial IECC)
-
Requires adherence to prescriptive envelope values.
- Additional considerations:
- REScheck has no minimum efficiency requirements for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems. COMcheck has thresholds for minimum lighting, mechanical, and plumbing system efficiencies.
- New: 2021 COMcheck requires 10 points to be claimed under Additional Energy Efficiency Credits.
-
Requires adherence to prescriptive envelope values.
-
Performance (Energy Modeling)
- Allows for trade-offs between envelope and MEP, enabling teams to analyze choices and invest selectively in building systems. Higher efficiency MEP systems allow for flexibility on elements of envelope (i.e. eliminating slab insulation).
- Recommended for projects that prefer to invest in higher efficiency MEP systems, prefer flexibility in envelope design, or would otherwise benefit from energy modeling for other purposes (i.e. HUD financing, Xcel Energy Design Rebate, solar analysis, and/or utility allowance analysis).
Pursuing energy modeling under the Performance path can yield significant benefits, particularly for larger buildings (50+ units), those under the Commercial IECC, and projects considering solar PV installations.
RESchecks and COMchecks impose strict adherence to minimum U-values, slab edge insulation, and overall envelope UA values. Although this approach may enhance envelope performance and occupant comfort, the cost-benefit ratio for meeting some of these prescriptive requirements can be less favorable than other high efficiency building system investments. An energy model will allow design teams to evaluate various packages of energy measures and select the option that aligns best with project goals. For instance, slab insulation is a mandatory requirement under the Prescriptive Path, but a modeling analysis will show that this has a <1% impact to energy performance while introducing added costs and construction complexities. A more worthwhile approach may be to direct resources toward improving MEP systems serving apartments, which may provide tenants with improved indoor air quality and/or reduced operational costs. Higher performance MEP systems may be further justified by leveraging funding opportunities from state, federal and utility rebates and tax credits.